Water meters, which can be purchased at any meter in the United States, are a great tool for government officials, especially those in rural areas, who may not have the means to afford one.
A few of the projects in the pipeline include: a water utility to monitor water quality in the Southwest, a pilot project to test a water-saving technology, and a pilot program to test anaerobic digestion in the Midwest.
As of the end of March, the Trump Administration has identified $3.1 billion in water infrastructure funds to fund projects across the country, including a $1.5 billion water treatment plant in Arizona and a $5 billion project in North Carolina.
In 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated that the cost of water-treatment facilities could cost as much as $60 billion.
With so much water in the country at risk, many people are looking to tap into the water infrastructure to make their homes and businesses safer.
“There is so much public pressure to tap the water and do it safely,” said David G. Miller, executive director of the Southern California Environmental Network, which advocates for the public good.
The Trump administration has promised to spend $1 billion to expand water and wastewater infrastructure, but it has yet to release a list of specific projects.
The Department of Energy and EPA have yet to announce their specific priorities for funding water infrastructure.
Miller told The Hill that water infrastructure is critical for protecting water resources.
It is a critical tool for our public health and our economic recovery,” he said.
Trump has made building infrastructure a priority, but he has made it a difficult task to fulfill.
The Environmental Protection Agency is facing criticism for prioritizing fossil fuel development over water infrastructure in its plan to tackle climate change.
The EPA has not released a final plan for the future of the EPA’s water and power programs.
During his campaign, Trump vowed to “re-write the rules of the road” in the energy sector.
He said he would “end the disastrous rule-making process of the Department of Transportation” to streamline the regulatory process and speed up construction.
Trump’s proposal to eliminate the EPA has caused some concern among environmental groups.
A new report from the Sierra Club found that Trump’s proposed plan to end the EPA would increase pollution and create “major delays to construction and deployment of our clean energy infrastructure.”
In 2017 alone, Trump proposed eliminating the Environmental Protection Office (EPA), which regulates the U: Environmental Protection agency and oversees EPA’s enforcement activities.
For more stories about water, visit The Hill’s Water: The Politics of Water and Power, a magazine for the Hill.”
This proposed action is a direct attack on the agency’s mission to ensure that federal policies are not in conflict with state and local laws, and to enforce the Clean Water Act to protect our public lands and waters,” said Sierra Club President Michael Brune in a statement.
For more stories about water, visit The Hill’s Water: The Politics of Water and Power, a magazine for the Hill.